Lots to admire in them reformin' mavericks.....

On Oct 12, 5:29*pm, wrote:

Hardly. *And I'd offer that _every_ person on ROFF has "abused their
power" in form or another and rationalized it to themselves. *Had this
been a Trooper with a good record who just happened to be divorcing her
sister, it would have been "wrong" of Palin to attempt to get him fired.

Should the people of Alaska be made aware of her "abuse?" *Yes. *Do I
think such "abuse" should influence, negatively or positively, them
(should she run for reelection) or national voters? *No.

HTH,

As one of the chief abusers, it would be interesting to hear how you
rationalise it. Obviously you are aware that you do abuse it, do you
know why you abuse it? Why do you consider it necessary to abuse it
at all?

On Oct 12, 5:46*pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 5:29*pm, wrote:

Hardly. *And I'd offer that _every_ person on ROFF has "abused their
power" in form or another and rationalized it to themselves. *Had this
been a Trooper with a good record who just happened to be divorcing her
sister, it would have been "wrong" of Palin to attempt to get him fired..

Should the people of Alaska be made aware of her "abuse?" *Yes. *Do I
think such "abuse" should influence, negatively or positively, them
(should she run for reelection) or national voters? *No.

HTH,

As one of the chief abusers, it would be interesting to hear how you
rationalise it. Obviously you are aware that you do abuse it, do you
know why you abuse it? *Why do you consider it necessary to abuse it
at all?

Indeed, it might even be interesting to hear why you are here at all.
Thanks to you and others this group no longer bears even a superficial
resemblance to a fishing group, and those still here do not even
bother making a pretense of it any more.

One is tempted to assume that you are so ineffectual elsewhere that
you use this place as some sort of dumping ground for your
frustrations. Although obviously a fool, you are just as obviously not
stupid. So why do you do it?

How do you rationalise your presence here?

Peaceful Bill wrote in news:4v8Ik.2934
:


So when is the trial date? Or didn't they find that there were any laws
broken?

"Zero convictions"!!! That's what I like to see in a Vice Prez. That'll
look great on the campaign T-shirts.

In fact, the firing was not a violation of law. The process and
motivations underlying the firing, though, apparantly are. Same as the
Attorney General scandals. Shamefully, the Alaska Republicans have more
sense of what's right than the Bush Administration, or Congress for that
matter.

Underlying this whole thing is the finding, largely, that Palin is
vindictive and petty, and willing to use her office to these ends. Rather
Cheney-like, no?

--
Scott
Reverse name to reply

wrote in
:

Hardly. And I'd offer that _every_ person on ROFF has "abused their
power" in form or another and rationalized it to themselve


Ahh. The birth of the "Connor Party"!! You saw it here first!!


--
Scott
Reverse name to reply

On Oct 12, 6:53*pm, Scott Seidman wrote:
wrote :

Hardly. *And I'd offer that _every_ person on ROFF has "abused their
power" in form or another and rationalized it to themselve

Ahh. *The birth of the "Connor Party"!! *You saw it here first!!

--
Scott
Reverse name to reply

Interesting that you should consider self-defence abuse.

Of course nasty ****ers like you obviously don´t like it much when
people defend themselves. It puts you in a very bad light.

On 12 Oct 2008 16:51:42 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote:

Peaceful Bill wrote in news:4v8Ik.2934
:


So when is the trial date? Or didn't they find that there were any laws
broken?

"Zero convictions"!!! That's what I like to see in a Vice Prez. That'll
look great on the campaign T-shirts.

In fact, the firing was not a violation of law. The process and
motivations underlying the firing, though, apparantly are.

Er, illegal motivations...? Man, combine that with justifiable cause
and nothing unlawful, and THAT could get interesting...

HTH,
R
....Geez, it's gonna look like some half-baked racial discrimination
case...

On Oct 12, 5:26*am, wrote:

Great fictional clarification. Now how about explaining away her
husbands $100+K, come-when-you-want-to job with the oil companies, or
better yet what she did with the "bridge-to-nowhere" money she let
folks at the convention believe that she turned back, AFTER she double
crossed Senator Stevens(R). Either one should provide a suitable
venue for creative writing.

But at least you do seem to do some of your own reading, as opposed to
the "Bills" who apparently are too lazy to check anything themselves
but prefer to just riff off of other posters. Laziness is non-
partisan.

Dave

On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 08:53:47 -0400, Dave LaCourse
wrote:

On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 11:31:40 GMT, "Tom Littleton"
wrote:

p.s. Why is this any excuse for Palin's abuse of power??

It wasn't and isn't an excuse for Palin's actions. If she did wrong,
she should pay for it. If Obama does wrong, he too should pay for it.
His connection with Acorn (talk about voting fraud!) is played up very
little in the press, as is his connection with Ayers and others.

It's all over the place.