TR: Monster Steelhead

On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 02:07:04 GMT, (Greg Pavlov)
wrote:

On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 19:49:20 -0500, Peter Charles
wrote:


**** zooms, primes rule!!!


"20 - 35" sounds like a zoom.

yup, I'm just trying to move the "luditite vs. early accepter"
argument back about three decades. Digital vs. film was starting to
bore and in the process, I'm skipping right over MF vs. AF and AE vs.
Manual.

Peter (happiest with a black cloth over his head)

Peter writes:

Peter (happiest with a black cloth over his head)


Change "cloth" to "slip" and, voila, you have wayno.
Dave

http://hometown.aol.com/davplac/myhomepage/index.html

"Peter Charles" wrote

jeez wayno, I think we're the only ones here who still know how to
focus all by their lone's self . . . .

no doubt.

**** zooms, primes rule!!!

trust me on this: the 20-35/2.8 is as good as anything you will ever
see. better than a 24 olympus prime that i tested it against, with 100asa
transparencies.

yfitons
wayno



Peter

turn mailhot into hotmail to reply

Visit The Streamer Page at
http://www.mountaincable.net/~pcharl...ers/index.html

Peter Charles wrote:

nice shot, nice fish, btw

"even though it was taken with a zoom" ?

Willi

"Dave LaCourse" wrote in message
...
Peter writes:

Peter (happiest with a black cloth over his head)


Change "cloth" to "slip" and, voila, you have wayno.
Dave

some things simply cannot be denied.

yfitons
wayno

On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 19:39:09 -0700, Willi wrote:



Peter Charles wrote:

nice shot, nice fish, btw

"even though it was taken with a zoom" ?

Willi





well, we all make have to make allowances once in a while.

Peter

turn mailhot into hotmail to reply

Visit The Streamer Page at http://www.mountaincable.net/~pcharl...ers/index.html

On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 02:20:40 GMT, "Wayne Harrison"
wrote:


"Peter Charles" wrote

jeez wayno, I think we're the only ones here who still know how to
focus all by their lone's self . . . .

no doubt.

**** zooms, primes rule!!!

trust me on this: the 20-35/2.8 is as good as anything you will ever
see. better than a 24 olympus prime that i tested it against, with 100asa
transparencies.

yfitons
wayno



wayno, work with me here -- we know that there are a few good zooms
out there but do we have to admit it????

Peter (just getting warmed up in his new luditite t-shirt and the rug
gets pulled)

looking for a new gig . . . . .

Peter

turn mailhot into hotmail to reply

Visit The Streamer Page at http://www.mountaincable.net/~pcharl...ers/index.html

net says...
My son Andy always seems to catch the biggest fish.
snipped

Damn Chas, THAT'S a fish! Tell Andy I said hello and congrats on the
hog. Nice pic btw.
--
Warren
(use troutbum_mt (at) yahoo to reply via email)
For Conclave Info:
http://www.geocities.com/troutbum_mt...nConclave.html

troutbum_mt wrote:

Damn Chas, THAT'S a fish! Tell Andy I said hello and congrats on the
hog. Nice pic btw.
--
Thanks Warren, I'll pass on the note. If you can get out here in the
next 6 weeks, I'll put you over one of these babies.

Chas
remove fly fish to reply
http://home.comcast.net/~chas.wade/w...ome.html-.html
San Juan Pictures at:
http://home.comcast.net/~chasepike/wsb/index.html

I dunno, I have visited the site at Caledonia, New York, from which Seth
Green is said to have introduced salmo trutta to America. It still exists
and it is still operating. Sure looks like a hatchery to me.

Yuji Sakuma,

========================================
"asadi" wrote in message
...
negatory.... didn't have the 'hatcheries' then that we do now....those
were more of the transplant variety

john