![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9 Nov, 05:10, Mike wrote:
On 9 Nov, 05:04, Dave LaCourse wrote: On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:44:19 -0800, Mike wrote: Any fool, including you, can catch a spawning fish without even trying. Put the lure in front of them and they will strike it. The term "shooting fish in a barrel" was surely coined to describe fishing the spawn. What's the matter, Tim, you can't catch fish the normal way, ya gotta go after the spawners to feel macho? Jerk. And apparently you can not read, Connor. Willi said I called Sandy a name. I did not. The entire conversation was civil. I called *Tim* a fool and jerk, because that is what he was in that post. And, yeah, I don't expect an apology from you either, but I do wish you would get the player's names correct. Try to follow the thread, Connor, instead of trying to exact your punishment on me. d;o) Dave Also Willi did not say you called Sandy a name; QUOTE Last place I know that Sandy posted was alt.flyfishing and even there his thread got flamed and finalized by some name calling by LaCourse. Willi UNQUOTE Which is the absolute truth. MC So, LaCourse, you called Willi a liar, which he is not, and you owe him an apology. MC |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike wrote in news:1194581264.075234.321940@
50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com: You can not read LaCourse, the phrase "Any fool, including you..............." applies to anybody who fishes the spawn. You were the only abusive person in that thread. I suppose we should all take a moment to thank the Fates that there were no sharp objects in the vicinity of whomever perceived himself the recipient of such a brutal, bloodcurdling, wounding-to-the-core-of-being, stream of invective. -- Scott Reverse name to reply |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 20:14:48 -0800, Mike
wrote: So, LaCourse, you called Willi a liar, which he is not, and you owe him an apology. No, Willi is a liar. He probably didn't mean to lie, but he should have gone back and read the thread before accusing me. Of course, *you* never call *anyone* names, do you, Connor. Anyone that disagrees with you is labeled, including those that stuck up for you originally and then found out what an absolute nut case you are. Go away, Mike, while you stll have a friend or two here. And, I notice Ken is still here. d;o) How well do you take failure. Bwwwaaaaaaahahahahaha. Dave |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave LaCourse wrote:
... And, I notice Ken is still here. d;o) ... Well yeah, but I'm on pins and needles worrying about the Düsseldorf branch of the FBI. LOL !! -- Ken Fortenberry |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave LaCourse wrote:
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 20:14:48 -0800, Mike wrote: So, LaCourse, you called Willi a liar, which he is not, and you owe him an apology. No, Willi is a liar. He probably didn't mean to lie, but he should have gone back and read the thread before accusing me. of one thing i am sure...of all the folks i know, willi isn't one i would ever accuse, or even suggest, as being a liar. i'll accept and rely on willi's statement of things. i too think you owe him an apology. Of course, *you* never call *anyone* names, do you, Connor. Anyone that disagrees with you is labeled, including those that stuck up for you originally and then found out what an absolute nut case you are. Go away, Mike, while you stll have a friend or two here. and i think such statements ridiculous. no one has authority, or right, to make such demands here. i say, stick around mike, you do have a friend or two here...but, even if you didn't, you're as welcome here as any of the rest of us...and you probably are needed here as much as anyone else. And, I notice Ken is still here. d;o) How well do you take failure. Bwwwaaaaaaahahahahaha. hmmm... and you think that a good thing because...? jeff |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:18:10 -0500, jeff
wrote: of one thing i am sure...of all the folks i know, willi isn't one i would ever accuse, or even suggest, as being a liar. i'll accept and rely on willi's statement of things. i too think you owe him an apology. Willi attacked me personally, Jeff, by saying I chased Sandy away from a thread by name calling. That is not true. I did not call Sandy anythng but Sandy, and the thread was civil. I disagreed with his assessment of fishing fish on the spawn, but I did not chase Sandy anywhere. In fact, if you look at the thread, he continued to post after my post to Timbo. I did not attack Sandy in that post. I was shocked when Willi said that, but the truth is in the thread. I did not chase Sandy away by calling him or anyone else names. That, unfortunately, makes Willi a liar. Dave |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9 Nov, 15:31, Dave LaCourse wrote:
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:18:10 -0500, jeff wrote: of one thing i am sure...of all the folks i know, willi isn't one i would ever accuse, or even suggest, as being a liar. i'll accept and rely on willi's statement of things. i too think you owe him an apology. Willi attacked me personally, Jeff, by saying I chased Sandy away from a thread by name calling. That is not true. I did not call Sandy anythng but Sandy, and the thread was civil. I disagreed with his assessment of fishing fish on the spawn, but I did not chase Sandy anywhere. In fact, if you look at the thread, he continued to post after my post to Timbo. I did not attack Sandy in that post. I was shocked when Willi said that, but the truth is in the thread. I did not chase Sandy away by calling him or anyone else names. That, unfortunately, makes Willi a liar. Dave You are lying again LaCourse. he did not say anything of the sort. Indeed he asked you nicely to calm down and be civil. MC |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:31:04 -0500, Dave LaCourse
wrote: On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:18:10 -0500, jeff wrote: of one thing i am sure...of all the folks i know, willi isn't one i would ever accuse, or even suggest, as being a liar. i'll accept and rely on willi's statement of things. i too think you owe him an apology. Willi attacked me personally, Jeff, by saying I chased Sandy away from a thread by name calling. That is not true. I did not call Sandy anythng but Sandy, and the thread was civil. I disagreed with his assessment of fishing fish on the spawn, but I did not chase Sandy anywhere. In fact, if you look at the thread, he continued to post after my post to Timbo. I did not attack Sandy in that post. I was shocked when Willi said that, but the truth is in the thread. I did not chase Sandy away by calling him or anyone else names. That, unfortunately, makes Willi a liar. Dave Actually, what Willi said was, IMO, absolutely correct, and IAC, it was not "a lie." I was curious as to what he said that led to yet another round of goofy golf AND got Scott and jeff involved so quickly, so I read the thread on alt.ff and reread Willi's post: "Last place I know that Sandy posted was alt.flyfishing and even there his thread got flamed and finalized by some name calling by LaCourse." It is, again IMO, absolutely correct and again IAC, not "a lie." He didn't say anyone chased anyone away and he did not say that you called Sandy anything. He said, accurately, that you did some "name calling" and you did call Tim "Jerk." While I'd agree with Scott that as "name calling" goes, on ROFF or in the real world, "jerk" ain't exactly up there with, oh, say, "Hillary supporter" or "worm-dunker," but it is "name calling." You know, sorta like what a 5 year-old might say. And you did "flame" Sandy and anyone else who chose to fish over spawners, so again, Willi was not lying. As to "finalized," I suppose one could argue that "Jerk." was not technically the "last word," but I don't see anyone with a bar card taking that windmill on contingency. Moreover, Sandy's response was a whole hell of a lot more accommodating than, IMO, it should have or needed to be. I don't think anyone would have thought less of him if he had told you, good-naturedly, to go **** yourself. And on that note and just as an aside, I took your "flaming" as generally good-natured until your reply to Tim, and while you have may have meant it good-naturedly, I can see how others might have it otherwise. HTH, R |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9 Nov, 15:56, Mike wrote:
On 9 Nov, 15:31, Dave LaCourse wrote: On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:18:10 -0500, jeff wrote: of one thing i am sure...of all the folks i know, willi isn't one i would ever accuse, or even suggest, as being a liar. i'll accept and rely on willi's statement of things. i too think you owe him an apology. Willi attacked me personally, Jeff, by saying I chased Sandy away from a thread by name calling. That is not true. I did not call Sandy anythng but Sandy, and the thread was civil. I disagreed with his assessment of fishing fish on the spawn, but I did not chase Sandy anywhere. In fact, if you look at the thread, he continued to post after my post to Timbo. I did not attack Sandy in that post. I was shocked when Willi said that, but the truth is in the thread. I did not chase Sandy away by calling him or anyone else names. That, unfortunately, makes Willi a liar. Dave You are lying again LaCourse. he did not say anything of the sort. Indeed he asked you nicely to calm down and be civil. MC QUOTE Willi View profile More options 23 Oct, 01:38 Newsgroups: alt.flyfishing From: Willi Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:38:55 -0600 Local: Tues 23 Oct 2007 01:38 Subject: Schooling Lake Trout Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Dave LaCourse wrote: On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 16:48:48 -0600, Willi wrote: Your posts weren't always like that. Perhaps they changed AFTER I stopped fishing the spawn. d;o) My comments are the truth; fishing a spawn is never sport. The fish are in an agitated state and will strike at just about anything. I discovered this while fishing for chinooks in Canada. They were fairly easy to hook, difficult to land. ANY spawning fish is easy to hook. Dave That's not true, there are spawning fish that are "impossible" to catch while spawning without snagging them. but that wasn't my point. Like I said in my last post, I knew you would rationalize all your negative posts, but take the time and read your last 100 and see what you think. Willi UNQUOTE QUOTE salmobytes View profile More options 24 Oct, 00:23 Newsgroups: alt.flyfishing From: salmobytes Date: 23 Oct 2007 16:23:52 -0700 Local: Wed 24 Oct 2007 00:23 Subject: Schooling Lake Trout Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author On Oct 23, 1:26 pm, Dave LaCourse wrote: On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 16:23:44 -0000, Halfordian Golfer wrote: This kind of thinking is like feeling guilty about a wet dream. Give me a freeking break man. It's sport when they're starving to survive (and feeding during a hatch) but it's not sport when they're striking defensively? You must drive yourself nuts. Any fool, including you, can catch a spawning fish without even trying. Put the lure in front of them and they will strike it. The term "shooting fish in a barrel" was surely coined to describe fishing the spawn. What's the matter, Tim, you can't catch fish the normal way, ya gotta go after the spawners to feel macho? Jerk. Dave Calm down Dave. Next thing you know this place will be as acrimonious as roff. Nobody's a jerk here, including you me and Tim. Spawning fish can be easy to catch. But like I pointed out earlier, I watched 3 guys (part of a guided trip out of West Yellowstone) strip streamers over those fish all day without a single hit. I put on a little more weight, waited a little longer after the cast, hand-twisted slowly, and knocked'em silly. After a few fish (it was fun for an hour or so) I let them be. They're over-populated there and they want you to konk'em. So--at least in that sense--sport (or lack thereof) is irrelevant. Fish'em if you want. Don't fish'em if you don't want. I'm easy. UNQUOTE You are not going to get away with this **** on here unchallenged again LaCourse. You failed to read or comprehend what people wrote, you called them fools and jerks, and now you accuse someone of lying. You are a mean stupid nasty man LaCourse, and you cause a great deal of trouble as a result. The only person lying here is you LaCourse. Furthermore, the only person "punishing" you on here is yourself you continually make yourself look stupid. I can´t "punish" anybody here, all I can do is tell the truth. MC |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9 Nov, 14:51, Dave LaCourse wrote:
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 20:14:48 -0800, Mike wrote: So, LaCourse, you called Willi a liar, which he is not, and you owe him an apology. No, Willi is a liar. He probably didn't mean to lie, but he should have gone back and read the thread before accusing me. Of course, *you* never call *anyone* names, do you, Connor. Anyone that disagrees with you is labeled, including those that stuck up for you originally and then found out what an absolute nut case you are. Go away, Mike, while you stll have a friend or two here. And, I notice Ken is still here. d;o) How well do you take failure. Bwwwaaaaaaahahahahaha. Dave Willi is not a liar LaCourse, you are the only one lying and bull****ting about this. I am not going anywhere LaCourse. I am going to challenge you every time you lie and bull****. MC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Sandy Juan Worm -- what is the difference? | sandy | Fly Fishing Tying | 24 | May 25th, 2007 08:01 PM |
Ping Sandy | Willi | Fly Fishing Tying | 2 | April 13th, 2007 07:37 AM |
Sandy River Spey Clave 2005 | Tom Nakashima | Fly Fishing | 5 | February 17th, 2005 09:06 PM |
Sandy River Poaching Story - Oregon | bugcaster | Fly Fishing | 1 | October 1st, 2004 10:39 AM |
Sandy River Or | Sam | General Discussion | 2 | February 23rd, 2004 07:16 PM |